From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,64012d256cd76a8d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-04-10 18:37:57 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!newsfeed.news2me.com!newsfeed2.earthlink.net!newsfeed.earthlink.net!wn14feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!sccrnsc01.POSTED!not-for-mail From: tmoran@acm.org Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Gnat/Windows float point Q References: X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.234.13.56 X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com X-Trace: sccrnsc01 1050025076 12.234.13.56 (Fri, 11 Apr 2003 01:37:56 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 01:37:56 GMT Organization: AT&T Broadband Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 01:37:56 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:36072 Date: 2003-04-11T01:37:56+00:00 List-Id: > Could this paragraph from the GNAT Reference Manual have any bearing on > this problem? > > 9.31 GNAT.Float_Control (`g-flocon.ads') I added a "with" and inserted as the first line after "begin" GNAT.Float_Control.Reset; It made no difference. I'm using Gnat 3.15p on Windows. Perhaps newer versions work differently? BTW, I note that "-gnato -O2" generates somewhat different results - still screwy in the same ways, but different.