From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,75c440b4b7ed5f91 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit From: clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP (Simon Clubley) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Real Time IO routines Date: 30 Oct 2007 08:37:25 -0600 Organization: Encompasserve Message-ID: References: <1193410739.367181.96050@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <87hckbeajm.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1193751416 27457 192.135.80.34 (30 Oct 2007 13:36:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:36:56 +0000 (UTC) Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!novia!newsfeed.yul.equant.net!news-peer1.sprintlink.net!news-kc-1!news.binc.net!clubley Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:2636 Date: 2007-10-30T08:37:25-06:00 List-Id: In article <87hckbeajm.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>, Ludovic Brenta writes: > > At Barco avionics, our coding standard prohibits functions that return > unconstrained types because they use the secondary stack, making > inspection of object code more difficult. That prohibition applies to > 'Image, too. But outside of safety-critical software, I see no reason > why 'Image should be prohibited. > Is your coding standard freely available by any chance ? I'd be interested in seeing what other Ada features are not allowed in your code as well as what other recommendations that your standard might make. Thanks, Simon. -- Simon Clubley, clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP Microsoft: Bringing you 1980's technology to a 21st century world