From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,539c04254abf1b37 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-28 07:58:33 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: compiler benchmark comparisons (was: naval systems) Date: 28 Feb 2002 09:58:30 -0600 Organization: Berbee Information Networks Corporation Message-ID: References: <3C74E519.3F5349C4@baesystems.com> <3C7D37FD.F67F7067@despammed.com> <17247c3d.0202271553.68aaf78d@posting.google.com> <338040f8.0202271819.373f733a@Organization: LJK Software NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1014911912 22355 192.135.80.34 (28 Feb 2002 15:58:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 15:58:32 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20576 Date: 2002-02-28T09:58:30-06:00 List-Id: In article <3C7E3C33.17E60A7D@despammed.com>, Wes Groleau writes: > With large C collections, to avoid unnecessary > recompilations, one generally runs a tool to > generate Makefiles (or painstakingly does it by > hand). With Ada, part of this job is done by > writing with clauses in the code, and the rest > of this job is part of the compile. When the tool that generates the makefiles is the previous run of the C compiler itself, the difference from Ada seems quite small.