From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,4eb65fab6deaa097 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Paul Makepeace" Subject: Re: Lockheed Martin Chooses Green Hills Ada for Joint Strike Fighter Date: 2000/04/13 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 610959850 References: <4eaJ4.23498$hh2.538870@news.flash.net> <8d4lpa$ffu$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8d531v$vcr$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8d57mo$4d9@chronicle.concentric.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 X-Complaints-To: abuse@sprint.ca X-Trace: newscontent-01.sprint.ca 955684275 149.99.142.134 (Thu, 13 Apr 2000 23:51:15 EDT) Organization: Sprint Canada Inc. NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 23:51:15 EDT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-04-13T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: >I was just going to ask if any DoD/govt projects ever used GNAT. It seems to >me that GNAT (and gcc in general) are way better than many commercial >equivalents (plus you get the source code:) but AFAIK, none of the "official" >projects here at VAFB have ever used any GNU or open source development tools >(if they have, they've kept quiet about it). > >Can you provide more examples? See the following site: http://www.mitre.org/support/swee/html/39_devine/index.htm then click on "Lack of Mature Tools". According to the website, both GNAT and AONIX have been used for this NATO project. Paul