From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,53d1d1eed63370ea
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: tarjeij@ulrik.uio.no (Tarjei Jensen)
Subject: Re: compile on a pc to a sparc
Date: 1996/07/12
Message-ID: <TARJEIJ.96Jul12094050@ulrik.uio.no>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 167945878
references: <4rrivk$naf@cville-srv.wam.umd.edu>
 <4s0puh$52a@felix.seas.gwu.edu>
organization: University of Oslo, Norway
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-07-12T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


> Robert Dewar writes:
>
>   And I noted the difficulties that come from the non-standard makefiles
>   in OS/2. That is one of many reasons that I am personally switching
>   from OS/2 to Win95, it will be much easier for me to be in a more
>   standard environment gcc-wise.

Does this mean that there will be no more OS/2 releases of GNAT? It is important
for me to know since I am planning to use that combination commercially. I am
planning to buy a support contract for that work.

In what way is OS/2 makefiles different from other makefiles. I have mainly
compiled OS/2 ready software so I have not done any work on makefiles.


Greetings,
--
// Tarjei T. Jensen 
//    tarjeij@ulrik.uio.no || fax +47 51664292  || voice +47 51 85 87 39
//   Support you local rescue centre: GET LOST!
// Working, but not speaking for the Norwegian Hydrographic Service.