From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!peer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!fx07.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Shark8 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0a1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Oberon and Wirthian languages References: <1ljwj8f.1wqbhvuabsdw1N%csampson@inetworld.net> <51c7d6d4-e3be-44d5-a4ce-f7e875345588@googlegroups.com> <%J32v.70539$kp1.45343@fx14.iad> <8761m535e4.fsf_-_@ludovic-brenta.org> <5352703a$0$6705$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: X-Complaints-To: abuse@teranews.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 19:25:39 UTC Organization: TeraNews.com Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 13:25:40 -0600 X-Received-Bytes: 2049 X-Received-Body-CRC: 2722083045 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:19448 Date: 2014-04-19T13:25:40-06:00 List-Id: On 19-Apr-14 13:17, Simon Clubley wrote: > On 2014-04-19, Georg Bauhaus wrote: >> On 19/04/14 13:50, Ludovic Brenta wrote: >>> Access types are required no matter what :/ >> >> Parasail (and some other experimental languages, I think) seem >> to tackle pointing with the help of components marked "optional", >> accompanied by specially designed definitions for copying, moving, and >> swapping. This combination is said to prevent the dangers of pointers. >> >> http://parasail-programming-language.blogspot.de/2012/08/a-pointer-free-path-to-object-oriented.html >> > > From what I can tell from that page, they still appear to be implemented > as pointers but it's just that this isn't directly visible at user code > level. > > I wonder where I've heard of the concept of type checked pointers > before ? :-) (IOW, look at the author's name; I didn't see that until > well into the page.) > > Simon. Tucker Taft? Who the heck is that? Nobody on comp.lang.ada is familiar with that guy. ;)