From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,78a1af350f4cf4b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Ed Falis" Subject: Re: Win2000 has 63,000 'defects' Date: 2000/02/15 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 586304616 References: <38A989B7.2D4D6B56@maths.unine.ch> <2000Feb15.143333.1@eisner> <2000Feb15.155800.1@eisner> X-Priority: 3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 X-Complaints-To: abuse@mediaone.net X-Trace: wbnws01.ne.mediaone.net 950654002 24.218.120.235 (Tue, 15 Feb 2000 17:33:22 EST) Organization: Road Runner X-MSMail-Priority: Normal NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 17:33:22 EST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-02-15T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: "Hyman Rosen" wrote in message > It would be interesting to see a defect analysis similar to that > Lucent study (which was for old pre-ANSI C code) done for a large Ada > project, to see what kinds of bugs show up there. I wonder if ACT > keeps statistics on that sort of thing, and if so, whether they would > be willing to comment. Well, there is that Steve Zeigler study on the Verdix compiler technology. Probably someone here has the URL for it. - Ed