From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,bdc41aa5ff8e1d93 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: stephenb@harlequin.co.uk (Stephen J Bevan) Subject: Re: Programmers -> Engineers; Engineers -> Programmers Date: 1996/08/16 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 174505889 references: <1996Aug8.115630.4568@relay.nswc.navy.mil> organization: Harlequin Ltd, Manchester, UK newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-08-16T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article jakrzy@ss2.magec.com (James A. Krzyzanowski) writes: Jack W Scheible (jscheibl@mason2.gmu.edu) wrote: : In _my_ experience, people who major in Computer Science tend to be : dullards; if they were not, they would have majored in EE. Unbelievable! Indeed. I was told (admittedly by a physicist) that people who took EE were dullards; if they were, not they would have taken physics :-) No doubt there is some group who thinks that physicists are dullards ... etc.