From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8d472879e3f609e0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-05 08:44:42 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!news.UVic.CA!cyclone.bc.net!tdsnet-transit!newspeer.tds.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Case sensitivity (was Re: no title) Date: 5 Jun 2003 10:44:36 -0500 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: <1054822431.105080@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1054827810 15271 192.135.80.34 (5 Jun 2003 15:43:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 15:43:30 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38689 Date: 2003-06-05T10:44:36-05:00 List-Id: In article <1054822431.105080@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>, Hyman Rosen writes: > Lionel.DRAGHI@fr.thalesgroup.com wrote: >> case sensitivity has no Pros, just Cons. > > As I said, it's clear to me that case insensitivity > is simply a prejudice of the language designers that > was forced upon all the users. In the same way that case sensitivity was forced on the C* users as a prejudice of the language designers.