From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.glorb.com!peer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad.highwinds-media.com!fx21.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Shark8 <OneWingedShark@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64;
 rv:32.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/32.0a1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: a new language, designed for safety !
References: <lmj8s6$hhp$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <1402308235.2520.153.camel@pascal.home.net> <85ioo9yukk.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
 <ln6tlg$1vc$1@dont-email.me>
 <255b51cd-b23f-4413-805a-9fea3c70d8b2@googlegroups.com>
 <ln6uv9$bk8$1@dont-email.me>
 <b22db9fb-a73d-438a-8cfd-f0bb1db70eed@googlegroups.com>
 <MPElv.491358$1w1.428312@fx03.iad> <ln77ei$de6$1@dont-email.me>
 <ln7pqb$s35$2@dont-email.me>
 <1129440363424130728.266844laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org>
 <39rmv.287397$Nf2.126763@fx01.iad>
 <1323470332424315608.501811laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org>
 <op.xh07zcmwule2fv@cardamome>
In-Reply-To: <op.xh07zcmwule2fv@cardamome>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <SOKqv.93355$kS7.63482@fx21.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@teranews.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 01:36:50 UTC
Organization: TeraNews.com
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 19:36:51 -0600
X-Received-Bytes: 1976
X-Received-Body-CRC: 296546464
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:187242
Date: 2014-06-25T19:36:51-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 25-Jun-14 16:41, Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57) wrote:
> Le Fri, 13 Jun 2014 03:28:28 +0200, Luke A. Guest <laguest@archeia.com>
> a écrit:
>
>> Shark8 <OneWingedShark@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 10-Jun-14 16:09, Luke A. Guest wrote:
>>>> I have similar concerns now they are the ones 'controlling' the
>>>> future is
>>>> ASIS,
>>>
>>> I remember you saying something like that.
>>> Is DIANA an acceptable alternative? (Its definition is not w/i the
>>> purview of AdaCore.)
>>
>> No, DIANA was an attempt to standardise on a compiler intermediate
>> representation (IR) for Ada compilers. It's too old, dated and there are
>> better IR's now.
>
> What is an “IR”, please?
>

IR => Intermediate Representation.