From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8d07b700201ae95
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "David Botton" <David@Botton.com>
Subject: Re: list of Windows available ADA compilers ?
Date: 2000/07/13
Message-ID: <SFbb5.473$T5.876@east2.usenetserver.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 645764357
References: <396C9757.4EE325A8@cadwin.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700
X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Complaints-To: support@usenetserver.com
Organization: WebUseNet Corp  http://www.usenetserver.com - Home of the
 fastest NNTP servers on the Net.
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 00:34:58 EDT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-07-13T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

GNAT
ObjectAda
JanusAda
Rational

"Nicolas Brunot"
> Does anybody knows how many ADA95 compilers can seriously be taken in
> account to develop under Windows NT ?
> - Aonix Objectada
> - Gnat
> - ?
> Who knows about a serious project developped with another one, if it
> exists ?
> We worry about the absence of competition in this field, and its
> possible consequences in the future.


If you are honestly concerned about this then your choice will have to be an
OpenSource choice, GNAT. Then this question is not an issue.

David Botton