From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AC_FROM_MANY_DOTS,BAYES_00 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6da0fabceb4bf9bf X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-02-11 07:40:33 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!wn14feed!worldnet.att.net!199.45.49.37!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller2.gnilink.net!nwrdny03.gnilink.net.POSTED!0f19ed38!not-for-mail From: "Frank J. Lhota" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <1j5k20p2ng25ukvupsebumcot60ugmsl90@4ax.com> Subject: Re: Win32 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 15:40:34 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 141.154.231.71 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net X-Trace: nwrdny03.gnilink.net 1076514034 141.154.231.71 (Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:40:34 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:40:34 EST Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5438 Date: 2004-02-11T15:40:34+00:00 List-Id: "Tim Rowe" wrote in message news:1j5k20p2ng25ukvupsebumcot60ugmsl90@4ax.com... > On 10 Feb 2004 22:11:39 +0100, Jerry van Dijk > wrote: > > A little sweeping! I have the gnatwin package installed > (ftp://ftp.cs.nyu.edu/pub/gnat/3.15p/winnt/), which includes WIndows > API bindings, though I've not used them yet; as you might note from my > other postings I'm looking at the .net bindings at the moment. I'd > guess that the biggest issue with gnatwin is likely to be the gnu > license which may not be suitable for your purposes. GNAT uses the LGPL, easily the most flexible licence around. I have done quite a lot of programming with the Win32Ada bindings, which is available both for GNAT and for ObjectAda. It is a very thin binding to the Win32 API services. It looks sort of ugly, but to those who are used to Win32 programming in C, it looks very familiar.