From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10ad19,c95df63b8a9a50cb X-Google-Attributes: gid10ad19,public X-Google-Thread: 10c949,c95df63b8a9a50cb X-Google-Attributes: gid10c949,public X-Google-Thread: 11390f,c95df63b8a9a50cb X-Google-Attributes: gid11390f,public X-Google-Thread: f8131,c95df63b8a9a50cb X-Google-Attributes: gidf8131,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,c95df63b8a9a50cb X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1153ea,c95df63b8a9a50cb X-Google-Attributes: gid1153ea,public X-Google-Thread: f645d,c95df63b8a9a50cb X-Google-Attributes: gidf645d,public X-Google-Thread: 114917,c95df63b8a9a50cb X-Google-Attributes: gid114917,public From: Craig Cockburn Subject: Re: Microsoft Job Posting - I need your help if you know any outstanding Developers Date: 1997/03/17 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 226282724 Distribution: inet X-NNTP-Posting-Host: scot.demon.co.uk References: <01bc32ac$200e40e0$100535cf@bellsouth.bellsouth.net> Organization: Mo dhachaidh Newsgroups: comp.lang,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.apl,comp.lang.asm.x86,comp.lang.asm370,comp.lang.awk,comp.lang.basic.misc,comp.lang.basic.visual,comp.lang.c++ Date: 1997-03-17T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Ann an sgriobhainn <332D83C8.3797@ix.netcom.com>, sgriobh Jim Smith >The problem with you folks is that you pretend to be "leading edge" >while in fact, all you want is some guy or gal to move to "wherever" to >be under the thumb of some empire builder. That's the way they used to >do it "in the old days". If you were really "leading edge" wouldn't you >be using the Internet to develop and test things on the Internet? If you >were really "leading edge", why would the guy or gal have to move to >"wherever"? To do e-mail from "wherever" instead of where he/she already >is? Isn't the Internet good enough for communicating? Oh, You're just >going to tell your customers it is but you don't believe in it yourself. >Or are you saying that the person you hire, with all the skills you are >asking for, has to have a supervisor looking over its shoulder to get >the work done. Get real! > I would tend to agree with the sendiment of this message. If Microsoft really wants to convince the world it's serious about the Internet and doesn't just see it as another cash cow then perhaps Microsoft could actually put some real technology and business structures in place to hire teleworkers en masse. Whilst there are a lot of computing jobs in Scotland (we make more computers per head of population than any other country) there is still a lot of pressure to move "down south" (=London area) or to the US to advance careers. If I could do that and not move, I would be a lot happier and more productive. A company which implemented teleworking large scale would gain a vast amount of first hand experience which could in turn be sold on to other companies considering teleworking to any degree. Has anyone got any statistics on how much more productive the average teleworker is over the average office worker? 10 years ago I was working for Digital and they did a small amount of teleworking, but it was fairly small scale. Perhaps things have changed. -- Craig Cockburn ("coburn"), Du\n E/ideann, Alba. (Edinburgh, Scotland) http://www.scot.demon.co.uk/ E-mail: craig@scot.demon.co.uk Sgri\obh thugam 'sa Gha\idhlig ma 'se do thoil e.