From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,3a9b49a9162025eb X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-02-19 19:53:23 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!nntp-relay.ihug.net!ihug.co.nz!west.cox.net!cox.net!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller2.gnilink.net!nwrdny02.gnilink.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: Hyman Rosen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030131 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Bye-bye Ada ? (Ada95 Wholesale Changes?) References: <3E3B7BB5.A1A070@adaworks.com> <3NY_9.9226$x63.6255@nwrddc01.gnilink.net> <3E40A07A.CD174746@adaworks.com> <1044457651.769640@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <3E42A61C.20905@cogeco.ca> <3E432DD4.7F256C85@adaworks.com> <3E43FA31.9873C5AA@adaworks.com> <3E44A869.DDB2352@adaworks.com> <7dr1a.10399$F25.4223@nwrddc02.gnilink.net> <3E4736B8.1A90C349@adaworks.com> <0yH1a.19068$F25.2303@nwrddc02.gnilink.net> <3E4FFE10.CD0B26A0@adaworks.com> In-Reply-To: <3E4FFE10.CD0B26A0@adaworks.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 03:53:21 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 162.83.247.198 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net X-Trace: nwrdny02.gnilink.net 1045713201 162.83.247.198 (Wed, 19 Feb 2003 22:53:21 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 22:53:21 EST Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:34247 Date: 2003-02-20T03:53:21+00:00 List-Id: Richard Riehle wrote: > And after reading all the postings, it seems to me that the Ada model > is still simpler, easier to understand, and more straightforward than > the rather confusing set of rules that characterize C++ inline functions. Yes, of course. Isn't it always? :-) Still, whenever I can, I want to make sure that on this newsgroup the C++ facts are gotten straight. That way, we can have proper discussions, without misinformation distorting the arguments.