From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,be23df8e7e275d73 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-08-03 08:16:03 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!193.251.151.101!opentransit.net!wanadoo.fr!proxad.net!feeder2-1.proxad.net!nnrp1.proxad.net.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "nicolas" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <9jrdl3$mh2$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de> <%hb87.917$%w2.3730577@nnrp3.proxad.net> <9jrt62$38t$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <3B619A6D.5DD6E782@home.com> <3B6636BA.96FD8348@home.com> <9kb3ub$hdo$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de> <9kchn1$lng$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de> <9kea9a$lsc$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <9keduf$qvc$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de> Subject: Re: Proving Correctness (was Java Portability) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2001 15:16:01 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.101.131.241 X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net X-Trace: nnrp1.proxad.net 996851761 195.101.131.241 (Fri, 03 Aug 2001 17:16:01 CEST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2001 17:16:01 CEST Organization: Guest of ProXad - France Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11230 Date: 2001-08-03T15:16:01+00:00 List-Id: "Georg Bauhaus" a �crit dans le message news: 9keduf$qvc$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de... > Marin David Condic wrote: > Only, this cannot be used to claim that there are no libraries for > Ada, I don't remember having said that ... I heard about some Ada libraries I sometime check Adapower :-) >or there is no equivalent to SUN class libraries, as Nicolas > has done (as far as I have understood his earlier postings.) I don't know yet a good enough XML library (with DTD and so on) we tried some which all had far too many limitations, and I know at least one project where it was decided to develop a home-made limited one for specific use. I'm not sure you can easily find exhaustive equivalent of : java.util.zip java.util.jar java.net java.rmi java.sql javax.sound javax.transaction javax.swing org.omg.corba ... etc ... without spending quite a lot of time searching or writing yourself too many things, while it just took me a few seconds to know their existence and availability with the HTML doc of a java compiler By the way, the automatic generation of docs in Java is really great ... > It's just not as convenient to use them as the use of a select set > of libraries coming with some Visual compilers. > not as convenient ... , that's the least you can say !!!