From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!backlog4.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 07:02:05 -0500 Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 08:02:04 -0400 From: Peter Chapin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada platforms and pricing, was: Re: a new language, designed for safety ! References: <1402308235.2520.153.camel@pascal.home.net> <85ioo9yukk.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <255b51cd-b23f-4413-805a-9fea3c70d8b2@googlegroups.com> <5ebe316d-cd84-40fb-a983-9f953f205fef@googlegroups.com> <2100734262424129975.133931laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org> <857442918424729589.090275laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org> <0eSdnZQ1fO9LTzzORVn_vwA@giganews.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-kiZ8RmLp72o1HLfiAKczgMF7AfWlh/0GGrr7UFfVkj2bHfedSGbbt7TfM5p9MIgqli9+AYTkv/Ab7gc!U1QzuHeYMtyLTPjOiSILlkyQH4r+STi7aocoVPqOiEMi+wr5nqAtS/lNnhmyEDI= X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 3221 Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:187071 Date: 2014-06-19T08:02:04-04:00 List-Id: On 2014-06-19 03:22, Natasha Kerensikova wrote: > I guess the bottom line is that your project and mine have actually very > different aims: you want a fun hobby, I want to help with compiler > diversity. Yes, I concur with your summary. I also know that picking an implementation language other than that which is being compiled will tend to greatly limit contributors. On the other hand, even in my project there will be significant amounts of Ada in the runtime system and libraries, etc. Actually a "strategic" goal of my project is to make people from both communities aware of each other. While the Ada people here tend to say, "why would you want to use [insert name of some non-Ada language] for anything?" I'm about 100% sure the Scala people on the other side would say, "Ada? Huh...?" However, in my view both are fine languages, each in its own way, and it would be cool to bring the communities together even if only in some small manner. In any case, I certainly am not claiming that my project will provide any useful degree of compiler diversity... at least not in the foreseeable future. Peter