From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AC_FROM_MANY_DOTS,BAYES_00 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,48fa8e3cfaec41af X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-07-22 11:15:14 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-out.nuthinbutnews.com!propagator-sterling!news-in.nuthinbutnews.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamfinder.gnilink.net!nwrddc01.gnilink.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "Frank J. Lhota" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: Subject: Re: worth the hassle? X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 18:15:13 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 141.157.176.41 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net X-Trace: nwrddc01.gnilink.net 1027361713 141.157.176.41 (Mon, 22 Jul 2002 14:15:13 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 14:15:13 EDT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:27309 Date: 2002-07-22T18:15:13+00:00 List-Id: "Stephen Leake" wrote in message news:uheirlk4z.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov... > My own opinion is that supporting limited types is a requirement for > any general-purpose container. > > This is probably one reason why Ada will never be as popular as C++; > in C++, you don't have to make this kind of decision :). Why isn't this a C++ issue as well? Certainly it is possible to declare the C++ equivalent of a limited type, i.e. a type for which assignment is not available.