From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,842accb6a7d76669
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-02 14:52:55 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.binc.net!kilgallen
From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: List container strawman 1.1
Date: 2 Nov 2001 16:52:51 -0600
Organization: LJK Software
Message-ID: <RTAgxYtQ8vOr@eisner.encompasserve.org>
References: <mailman.1004737572.17072.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org
X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1004741574 6823 192.135.80.34 (2 Nov 2001
 22:52:54 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 22:52:54 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15708
Date: 2001-11-02T16:52:51-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <mailman.1004737572.17072.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>, Eric Merritt <cyberlync@yahoo.com> writes:
> Not to rain on the discussion but I have to say that
> the use of the "+" instead of Constructor is not very
> intuitive. Someone suggested Make and Construct
> wouldn't be bad, but I think "+" lacks readability and
> could be confusing.

Yes, let's not emulate C.