From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6e10dbd84b94a267
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: obilynoh@ktb.net (Graffiti)
Subject: Re: GNAT Compilation Problems
Date: 1996/09/21
Message-ID: <R.520gjr$tf6@ktb2.ktb.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 184893299
references: <51u63c$80c@netty.york.ac.uk>
 <01bba753$d2824ee0$1c8371a5@dhoossr.iquest.com>
organization: KTB Internet Online
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-09-21T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Reposting article removed by rogue canceller.

In article <01bba753$d2824ee0$1c8371a5@dhoossr.iquest.com>,
David C. Hoos, Sr. <david.c.hoos.sr@ada95.com> wrote:
>Nigel J. Tracey <njt@minster.york.ac.uk> wrote in article
><51u63c$80c@netty.york.ac.uk>...
[snip]
>> 
>> gcc: Internal compiler error: program gnat1 got fatal signal 11

Although this post would be more appropriate in a linux newsgroup, I'll
answer it anyways.  Sig 11 indicates hardware trouble.  This comes up
so often, it's not only in a FAQ, there's a web page dedicated to it.

You'll find it at http://www.bitwizard.nl/sig11

obilynoh@ktb.net