From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,97f543c7a63b8839 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.megapath.net!news.megapath.net.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 15:47:27 -0500 From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <87iryk1eic.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <87oe88bvse.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> Subject: Re: Composing tasks and protected objects Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 15:50:53 -0500 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4952.2800 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4952.2800 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.32.209.38 X-Trace: sv3-WpcLbprBFbuGSO6nsQ1/cIFq8NzqWlL004mlrmDbUAeS4Dk/VMLfyx+rA7VoEi7ihJitNfsq32h61Kd!TW4+rQAtsqfRJqMrh7ho9ryGEY+LANFINDzrPc3H0dzgg3iYCX9xPJ/kJGDBuZ2qIrmmXSLMb1w5 X-Complaints-To: abuse@megapath.net X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@megapath.net X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.32 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4034 Date: 2005-08-08T15:50:53-05:00 List-Id: "Florian Weimer" wrote in message news:87oe88bvse.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de... .... > This introduces overhead in terms of an additional task, and the > Forwarder and Server are strongly coupled (unless you manually write > wrappers, because access-to-entry types are missing). Yes, but an implementation of the proposed feature probably would have to introduce that task anyway. It would end up costing about the same, yet it would look cheap. That's generally bad language design. Randy.