From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2308afbbe4ecec0b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: tmoran@bix.com
Subject: Re: Subverting 'Access for Sub-programs
Date: 1999/08/05
Message-ID: <Qylq3.465$06.38224@typhoon-sf.snfc21.pbi.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 509291127
References: <wcczp06jj39.fsf@world.std.com>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@pacbell.net
X-Trace: typhoon-sf.snfc21.pbi.net 933881136 207.214.211.134 (Thu,
 05 Aug 1999 12:25:36 PDT)
Organization: SBC Internet Services
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 05 Aug 1999 12:25:36 PDT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-08-05T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> ... true of 'Unchecked_Access on subprograms,
>but please note that the design team never wanted to allow that.
  Have I missed a message where the safe method the design team
contemplated was described?