From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ac39a12d5faf5b14 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-12 04:11:54 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!out.nntp.be!propagator-SanJose!in.nntp.be!news-in-sanjose!newsfeed.onecall.net!chcgil2-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Rant! (was) Development process in the Ada community Followup-To: comp.lang.ada Date: 12 Apr 2002 06:11:23 -0500 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: <3CB46975.90408@snafu.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1018609888 19497 192.135.80.34 (12 Apr 2002 11:11:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 11:11:28 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:22414 Date: 2002-04-12T06:11:23-05:00 List-Id: In article , Ingo Marks writes: > - Who continues Ada compiler support in the future? Now we have some kind > companies who provide good Ada compilers (commercial and for free). But > someday they could say: "There is no more demand for commercial Ada so we > have decided to stop further Ada support." What then? It is not enough to > have a good dynamic Ada standardization process. It is also important to > have continuing Ada compiler support in the future! And Microsoft could say that .NET was the wave of the future, replacing COM, which had replaced DCOM, which had replaced something whose name I forget. Or Apple could drop support for AOCE when they thought it unpopular. Frankly I trust small companies much more than larger ones.