From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,29850945228df59 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-17 07:59:07 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!tdsnet-transit!newspeer.tds.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Boehm-Demers-Weiser conservative garbage collector and GNAT Date: 17 Jun 2003 09:59:02 -0500 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: <1316747.mXveBPtf0Z@linux1.krischik.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1055861909 1011 192.135.80.34 (17 Jun 2003 14:58:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 14:58:29 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:39338 Date: 2003-06-17T09:59:02-05:00 List-Id: In article , Ludovic Brenta writes: > Yes. I've never really liked GC myself, but the paper that Martin > mentions says that programmers spend up to 30% of their time doing > (and debugging) memory management, and that perhaps this 30% could be > better spent elsewhere. Does that paper say _Ada_ programmers spend that much time ? If so, then programmers for some other languages must spend 110% of their time debugging memory managment issues.