From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,d0715d5e4ba7908b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.megapath.net!news.megapath.net.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 17:27:46 -0600 From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <1110998197.165590.63800@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> <1111066266.099494.162830@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Fixed point attributes Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 17:30:05 -0600 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4927.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4927.1200 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.32.209.38 X-Trace: sv3-2CVAg+tcygkcHvisflPAK5znOrUanBOVLdHc9IrkuaOvltkdGC/nITYjCTb0gjO9FC/59jTklwMuREg!pIYHgvmQ/7imMZZNZ1rgtbI2AaCbEoq8kXcdV+lNKLEt5aNbt47bAF9p874Ulm4zZmMo/Nzaa8co X-Complaints-To: abuse@megapath.net X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@megapath.net X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.32 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9570 Date: 2005-03-17T17:30:05-06:00 List-Id: wrote in message news:1111066266.099494.162830@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... > I see your point, but according to > http://www.grammatech.com/rm95html-1.0/rm9x-03-05-10.html, > > --- > The following attributes are defined for every fixed point subtype S: Nope; it's only defined for decimal types. You missed 3.5.10(6): The following additional attributes are defined for every decimal fixed point subtype S: And Round follows that. BTW, a better looking version of the RM (which also includes the Corrigendum updates) can be found at: http://www.adaic.com/standards/ada95.html You can also find the working draft of Ada 2005 there (with some searching). Randy. > So I was thinking that if they could define Round they could define the > other two as well. Makes sense, but you misread the Standard.