From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b6e97963d32ee242
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-21 13:53:08 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!wn13feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi_feed4!attbi.com!sccrnsc04.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: tmoran@acm.org
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: The old "Object.Method" syntax debate
References: <slrnbcngv6.aap.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader
Message-ID: <QGRya.935846$F1.115533@sccrnsc04>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.234.13.56
X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com
X-Trace: sccrnsc04 1053550384 12.234.13.56 (Wed, 21 May 2003 20:53:04 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 20:53:04 GMT
Organization: AT&T Broadband
Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 20:53:04 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:37617
Date: 2003-05-21T20:53:04+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> > Well with a decent IDE -- e.g., GNAT with emacs and ada-mode, just
> > click on the identifier, and go to the subprogram spec.
>
> Sure, but try this on printed paper :-)
   Do the 170 lines of change include changing all tools that have
Ada syntax built in?