From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ac39a12d5faf5b14 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-21 00:14:13 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!207.115.63.138!newscon04.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr14.news.prodigy.com.POSTED!not-for-mail From: tmoran@acm.org Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Development process in the Ada community References: X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.115.105.248 X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net X-Trace: newssvr14.news.prodigy.com 1019373232 ST000 67.115.105.248 (Sun, 21 Apr 2002 03:13:52 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 03:13:52 EDT Organization: Prodigy Internet http://www.prodigy.com X-UserInfo1: Q[R_@SVGXZUWSVPXN[O@_WH@YR_B@EXLLBWLOOAF@YUDUWYAKVUOPCW[ML\JXUCKVFDYZKBMSFX^OMSAFNTINTDDMVW[X\THOPXZRVOCJTUTPC\_JSBVX\KAOTBAJBVMZTYAKMNLDI_MFDSSOLXINH__FS^\WQGHGI^C@E[A_CF\AQLDQ\BTMPLDFNVUQ_VM Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 07:13:52 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:22857 Date: 2002-04-21T07:13:52+00:00 List-Id: > Imagine if my development efforts would have been used to modify and extend > CLAW instead of writing GWindows...... I have, and I think it a great loss to the Ada community that you didn't. >GWindows covers almost all areas of CLAW (some intentionally not covered) >and is way beyond it in other areas (database to control bindings, ActiveX, David, it's good to see someone take pride in their product, but IMHO you exaggerate more than a bit. >CLAW would be the basis of a standard or be extended by the wider community >of programmers..... or outlive its own developers.... Is GWindows then the basis of some standard? Has it been extended by the wider community? Is it under as active development as Claw? As to outliving its developers, we'll have to leave that to others to see. ;) Tom Moran