From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Thread: 109fba,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Thread: 115aec,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Thread: f43e6,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid109fba,gid115aec,gidf43e6,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!wn13feed!worldnet.att.net!12.120.4.37!attcg2!attcg1!ip.att.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++,comp.realtime,comp.software-eng Subject: Re: Teaching new tricks to an old dog (C++ -->Ada) Date: 5 Mar 2005 16:08:28 -0600 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: <4229bad9$0$1019$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <1110053977.478846@athnrd02> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1110060403 12220 192.135.80.34 (5 Mar 2005 22:06:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 22:06:43 +0000 (UTC) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8688 comp.lang.c++:44232 comp.realtime:972 comp.software-eng:4503 Date: 2005-03-05T16:08:28-06:00 List-Id: In article <1110053977.478846@athnrd02>, Ioannis Vranos writes: > Mark Lorenzen wrote: > >> You can do everything in Ada that you can in C and C++. > > > I suppose you mean in the application-programming domain. But I do not > think this is true in the systems programming domain, that is efficiency > under *severe* run-time and space constraints. And what guesswork makes you think there would be efficiency problems with Ada ? > Also I am not sure if ADA is suitable for library writing, or you will > have to switch to another language to do that. Huh ? Again, what guesswork makes you suggest that ? It is even possible in Ada to make the calling convention be the unsafe C-style interface (null terminated strings, etc.). But for better safety in all the languages that might call the library, it is better to avoid those C conventions.