From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,865386f3ea1dd9f0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.enertel.nl!nntpfeed-01.ops.asmr-01.energis-idc.net!216.196.110.149.MISMATCH!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeeder.wxs.nl!transit.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:24:00 +0100 From: Colin Paul Gloster Subject: Re: [Ada] implement many new Ada 2005 features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: X-X-Sender: NULL@news1.news.xs4all.nl MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.84.206.176 X-Trace: 1109517677 news.xs4all.nl 28982 [::ffff:213.84.206.176]:10235 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8509 Date: 2005-02-27T16:24:00+01:00 List-Id: On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Robert A Duff wrote: "Marin David Condic writes: > But would you suggest that college level compiler classes not assign > their students to go write a compiler? Probably not. ... An Ada compiler is probably not the best choice for a college course. ;-)" For an entirely different reason a compilers lecturer I used to have had a problem with Ada: he believed that structural equivalence and compatiblity of types (i.e. weaktyping) was superior to strong typing. Yikes!