From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,67a38b984eb3c1f1
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Peter Amey <pna@erlang.praxis.co.uk>
Subject: Re: pragma Interface
Date: 1996/11/11
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.961111091055.28217A-100000@erlang.praxis.co.uk>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 195968537
references: <3284C3F3.6A65@easynet.fr>
content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
organization: Praxis plc, U.K.
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-11-11T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


On Sat, 9 Nov 1996, cyberia wrote:

> 
> Why was pragma Interface removed from Ada 95?
> 

Because the superior pragmas Import, Export and Convention provide a 
superset of it functionality.  Compiler vendors are permitted to provide 
pragma interface for upwards compatibility.

Peter