From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,9e20292f693f1408 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Brian Rogoff Subject: Re: ADA CORE TECHNOLOGIES ANNOUNCES GNAT-TO-JAVA SYSTEM Date: 1997/09/16 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 273133637 References: <34196E8E.1790@gsfc.nasa.gov> <341B2309.4A41@ibm.net> X-Trace: 874462275 29934 (none) 206.86.0.12 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-09-16T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: On 14 Sep 1997, Robert Dewar wrote: > Ralph Paul says > > < I'm sure everything is going to be great once we get the benefit of this > stuff>> > > Don't get me wrong, I think that the Ada to JVM technology has great > promise (or we would not be embarking on this project), but the idea > of using it to get greater portability in avionics applications seems > pushing things a bit :-) I realize that the JVM port is motivated (quite rightly, IMO) by economic reasons, but I wonder if some other "intermediate form" besides byte codes might be better if one wanted a portable format which could then be compiled. -- Brian