From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,3d3f20d31be1c33a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Brian Rogoff Subject: Re: Warts was Re: The stupidity of all the Ariane 5 analysts. Date: 1997/08/08 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 262992282 References: <5qitoi$fdv$1@news.irisa.fr><33CD6512.2404@flash.net> <01bc92e6$7a6f9e40$287b7b7a@tlo2><33CEAF05.6389@flash.net> <33D2827B.41C67EA6@eiffel.com><5qucs7$jie$3@flood.weeg.uiowa.edu> <33D3F2CB.61DC@flash.net><5r4952$nca$1@flood.weeg.uiowa.edu> <33DE3CC7.2294@gsg.eds.com> <33E07E29.69CB@eurocontrol.fr><33E7B7A5.56FF@gsg.eds.com> <5scqlr$ju@news.sei.cmu.edu> Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-08-08T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: On 8 Aug 1997, Jon S Anthony wrote: > In article Brian Rogoff writes: > That's not nearly as bad as the one about how limited types are not > required to be passed by reference. A flaw that was continued into > Ada95 (with only partial mitigation). > > > I posted an example of such a problem about a month ago. I am writing an > > The one I site, shows up in the GC stuff - I guess which is more > "favorite" depends on what your working on :-) Actually, I agree that your 'fave' is nastier. There is an idiomatic workaround to my "problem" (lack of interleaving), you just create a dummy package each time which simulates a sequence of alternating public and private parts. It is an ugly (IMO) yet fairly straightforward workaround. I don't know of a good workaround for you yet. -- Brian