From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c70f02b79bc3d231
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Brian Rogoff <bpr@shellx.best.com>
Subject: Re: dynamic memory allocation
Date: 1997/06/17
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.3.95.970617093222.6161A-100000@shellx.best.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 249095758
References: <33A55F1B.63FE@gsfc.nasa.gov> <dewar.866539898@merv>
 <33A6A38D.658B@gsfc.nasa.gov>
To: Stephen Leake <Stephen.Leake@gsfc.nasa.gov>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-06-17T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


On Tue, 17 Jun 1997, Stephen Leake wrote:
> I whole-heartedly agree, but I don't carry enough weight around here to
> change minds. And unfortunately, neither do newsgroup discussions.
> 
> So I repeat my query; can anyone provide references to authoritative
> texts that discuss this issue? 

http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/oops/papers.html

See the allocator survey, "Dynamic Storage Allocation: A Survey and
Critical Review". Maybe not exactly what you want, but it should be close, 
and has lots of useful references.

-- Brian