From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,23c0de5a42cf667e X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!feeder.erje.net!news-2.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!news.uni-weimar.de!not-for-mail From: stefan-lucks@see-the.signature Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT packages in Linux distributions Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 15:02:50 +0200 Organization: Bauhaus-Universitaet Weimar Message-ID: References: <87mxw9x7no.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <16bz9kvbqa8y9$.155ntpwpwl29d.dlg@40tude.net> <4be97bea$0$2966$ba4acef3@reader.news.orange.fr> <1p87qdlnjbufg.127laayhrw9x3$.dlg@40tude.net> <4j73xhgimt6r$.pu55kne2p2w5$.dlg@40tude.net> Reply-To: stefan-lucks@see-the.signature NNTP-Posting-Host: medsec1.medien.uni-weimar.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="8323584-1875589804-1274878970=:26620" X-Trace: tigger.scc.uni-weimar.de 1274875888 19144 141.54.178.228 (26 May 2010 12:11:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@tigger.scc.uni-weimar.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 12:11:28 +0000 (UTC) X-X-Sender: lucks@medsec1.medien.uni-weimar.de In-Reply-To: Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11056 Date: 2010-05-26T15:02:50+02:00 List-Id: This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323584-1875589804-1274878970=:26620 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Wed, 26 May 2010, Yannick Duch�ne (Hibou57) wrote: > Please, can you tell me more about what �annotations� implies to you ? Annotations are an addition to the original language. Annotations are typically "hidden" in comments (from the viewpoint of the original language). This is in constrast to contracts defined as a part of the language itself. (Technically, the language with the annotations makes a new language ... but there is a gap between the normal part of the language, and the comment-like annotations. > To give a small talk, I would just say that if it either appears in > comment or in plain language source, I do not see a difference. I am a university teacher. For me, it makes quite a difference if I either explain studens one coherent language where contracts are an integral part of (like Eiffel), or one programming langugage plus an additional language for the annotations. -- ------ Stefan Lucks -- Bauhaus-University Weimar -- Germany ------ Stefan dot Lucks at uni minus weimar dot de ------ I love the taste of Cryptanalysis in the morning! ------ --8323584-1875589804-1274878970=:26620--