From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,23c0de5a42cf667e X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!news.k-dsl.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!news.uni-weimar.de!not-for-mail From: stefan-lucks@see-the.signature Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT packages in Linux distributions Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 19:08:16 +0200 Organization: Bauhaus-Universitaet Weimar Message-ID: References: <87mxw9x7no.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <16bz9kvbqa8y9$.155ntpwpwl29d.dlg@40tude.net> <4be97bea$0$2966$ba4acef3@reader.news.orange.fr> <4be98123$0$27617$ba4acef3@reader.news.orange.fr> <4be9814d$0$27617$ba4acef3@reader.news.orange.fr> Reply-To: stefan-lucks@see-the.signature NNTP-Posting-Host: medsec1.medien.uni-weimar.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="8323584-416354729-1273597696=:13373" X-Trace: tigger.scc.uni-weimar.de 1273594546 3478 141.54.178.228 (11 May 2010 16:15:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@tigger.scc.uni-weimar.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 16:15:46 +0000 (UTC) X-X-Sender: lucks@medsec1.medien.uni-weimar.de In-Reply-To: <4be9814d$0$27617$ba4acef3@reader.news.orange.fr> Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:11502 Date: 2010-05-11T19:08:16+02:00 List-Id: This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323584-416354729-1273597696=:13373 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Tue, 11 May 2010, Pascal Obry wrote: > Le 11/05/2010 18:09, Pascal Obry a �crit : > > Le 11/05/2010 18:05, Yannick Duch�ne (Hibou57) a �crit : > >> While they can be compared in some way, there is indeed a big difference > >> : Eiffel is runtime oriented, SPARK is static analysis oriented. > > > > Right, I've worked on both languages SPARK and Eiffel. > > I meant "I've worked with both..." I am curious. Would you be willing to share some of your experience and tell us about the advantages and disadvantages of both approaches? Stefan -- ------ Stefan Lucks -- Bauhaus-University Weimar -- Germany ------ Stefan dot Lucks at uni minus weimar dot de ------ I love the taste of Cryptanalysis in the morning! ------ --8323584-416354729-1273597696=:13373--