From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,ec3de1b455c3909f,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news-lei1.dfn.de!news.uni-weimar.de!not-for-mail From: stefan-lucks@see.the.signature Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: unexpected behaviour of finalize Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:33:27 +0200 Organization: Bauhaus-Universitaet Weimar Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: medsec1.medien.uni-weimar.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: tigger.scc.uni-weimar.de 1207302055 9707 141.54.178.228 (4 Apr 2008 09:40:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@tigger.scc.uni-weimar.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 09:40:55 +0000 (UTC) X-X-Sender: lucks@medsec1.medien.uni-weimar.de Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20795 Date: 2008-04-04T11:33:27+02:00 List-Id: Hi, I have written a little program to demonstrate finalisation. The idea is to locally declare a singelton object of a class derived from Ada.Finalization.Limited_Controlled, and to override the Finalize method. When the sigelton object leaves scope, Finalize than cleans up whatever needs to be cleaned up. At a first look this appeared to work nicely. But when done in a recursive subprogram, Finalize rather unexpectedly seems to always read the local parameters of the innermost scope. Here is a test case: ---begin fin_test_case.adb with Ada.Text_IO, Ada.Finalization; procedure Fin_Test_Case is type Fin is new Ada.Finalization.Limited_Controlled with null record; procedure Do_Something (I: Natural) is type My_Fin is new Fin with null record; overriding procedure Finalize(Self: in out My_Fin) is S: String := Natural'Image(I); begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line(" Do_Something Finalization " & S); end Finalize; Singleton: My_Fin; begin -- Do_Something Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line(" I = " & Natural'Image(I)); if I>0 then Do_Something(I-1); Do_Something(I-1); end if; end Do_Something; begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line("Start Do_Something (2)"); Do_Something(2); Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line("Stop Do_Something (2)"); end Fin_Test_Case; ---end fin_test_case.adb This is what I got: ---begin output Start Do_Something (2) I = 2 I = 1 I = 0 Do_Something Finalization 0 I = 0 Do_Something Finalization 0 Do_Something Finalization 0 I = 1 I = 0 Do_Something Finalization 0 I = 0 Do_Something Finalization 0 Do_Something Finalization 0 Do_Something Finalization 0 Stop Do_Something (2) ---end output Somehow, the local parameter I is always 0 when finalize is called. What I expected was the following: ---begin expected output Start Do_Something (2) I = 2 I = 1 I = 0 Do_Something Finalization 0 I = 0 Do_Something Finalization 0 Do_Something Finalization 1 I = 1 I = 0 Do_Something Finalization 0 I = 0 Do_Something Finalization 0 Do_Something Finalization 1 Do_Something Finalization 2 Stop Do_Something (2) ---end expected output Now, is my expectation wrong? Or is this a compiler bug? I am using GNAT GPL 2007 (20070405-41). So long Stefan -- ------ Stefan Lucks -- Bauhaus-University Weimar -- Germany ------ Stefan dot Lucks at uni minus weimar dot de ------ I love the taste of Cryptanalysis in the morning! ------