From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,cbb5b0d14f503195 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed.gamma.ru!Gamma.RU!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.belwue.de!th!lucks From: Stefan Lucks Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Working with incompetent adaists / unsafe typing war story Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 22:02:31 +0100 Organization: InterNetNews at News.BelWue.DE (Stuttgart, Germany) Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: th.informatik.uni-mannheim.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: news.BelWue.DE 1140210153 27956 134.155.91.85 (17 Feb 2006 21:02:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@news.belwue.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:02:33 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2941 Date: 2006-02-17T22:02:31+01:00 List-Id: > AUnit ends up with a lot of unit test code (seems to be about three > times the operational code), so there's an interest in finding a more > cost-effective tool (I rather think that what we want is a more > cost-effective way of testing the code, which is not quite the same > thing, but that's another story). A lightweight alternative to AUnit may be tg, see http://www.free-software-consulting.com/projects/tg/index.html While tg follows a very simple straightforward approach to generating test code, I found it very nice for teaching purposes. -- Stefan Lucks Th. Informatik, Univ. Mannheim, 68131 Mannheim, Germany e-mail: lucks@th.informatik.uni-mannheim.de home: http://th.informatik.uni-mannheim.de/people/lucks/ ------ I love the taste of Cryptanalysis in the morning! ------