From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,546c9d71cfb0c1ee X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-03-16 05:59:20 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!zeus.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!green.octanews.net!news-out.octanews.net!news.glorb.com!newsgate.cistron.nl!news.cambrium.nl!news.cambrium.nl!newsfeed.kabelfoon.nl!195.129.110.21.MISMATCH!bnewsfeed00.bru.ops.eu.uu.net!bnewsinpeer01.bru.ops.eu.uu.net!bnewspost00.bru.ops.eu.uu.net!emea.uu.net!read.news.fr.uu.net!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:59:28 +0100 From: Arnaud Charlet X-X-Sender: charlet@aix.act-europe.fr Subject: Re: [Announcement] New Project: ASIS for GNAT In-Reply-To: <1420314.lQdMtk62IO@linux1.krischik.com> Message-ID: References: <1252369.os30E2mMWi@linux1.krischik.com> <3zl4c.17228$mM.123491@attbi_s02> <87ish8iit1.fsf@insalien.org> <4441304.6rRzW27CSL@linux1.krischik.com> <877jxns0e2.fsf@insalien.org> <1413383.96bL1pG4j9@linux1.krischik.com> <871xnvrqvl.fsf@insalien.org> <1420314.lQdMtk62IO@linux1.krischik.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII NNTP-Posting-Host: aix.act-europe.fr X-Trace: 1079445559 read.news.fr.uu.net 19655 212.157.227.143 X-Complaints-To: abuse@fr.uu.net Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6343 Date: 2004-03-16T14:59:28+01:00 List-Id: > ACT did not answer my e-Mail. FWIW, I haven't seen your email. Note that having a reliable ASIS working with a particular GNAT version is a lot of work, and certainly much more than just putting some sources together as you described, since there's a very close relationship between the GNAT and ASIS data structures. I'm afraid your resulting source package will suffer from the same trouble gcc 3.3 did: frozen Ada sources with a moving (incompatible) GCC back-end that compiles but is pretty unreliable. Same comment for glade btw: the glade run time is tightly coupled with the corresponding GNAT run time. Arno