From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8227b7940e2fe2bb X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-11-25 01:43:31 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.esat.net!lnewspeer01.lnd.ops.eu.uu.net!bnewspeer00.bru.ops.eu.uu.net!auucp0.ams.ops.eu.uu.net!bnewsifeed01.bru.ops.eu.uu.net!lnewspost00.lnd.ops.eu.uu.net!emea.uu.net!read.news.fr.uu.net!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 10:40:08 +0100 From: Arnaud Charlet X-X-Sender: charlet@aix Subject: Re: GNAT bug reports (Was: GNAT Programming System availability ?) In-Reply-To: <3ddb4171$0$298$bed64819@news.gradwell.net> Message-ID: References: <3ddb4171$0$298$bed64819@news.gradwell.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII NNTP-Posting-Host: aix.act-europe.fr X-Trace: 1038217409 read.news.fr.uu.net 196 212.157.227.143 X-Complaints-To: abuse@fr.uu.net Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:31208 Date: 2002-11-25T10:40:08+01:00 List-Id: > Somebody in this newsgroup has said that GNAT developers do not > read c.l.a . You, Arno, is an example of opposite. I unfortunately do not have the time nor the energy to follow all threads and discussions on this newsgroup (but then, who does ?), in particular since so many reports are done as a "by the way" note under some obscure thread. The particular message I am responding to is a very good example of deviating from the original subject (GPS availability). > So whether we should duplicate our bug reports in email or just > in newsgroup is enough? There is no relationship between some ACT people reading c.l.a, and having reports on c.l.a be magically forwarded to report@gnat. I am no better at forwarding messages (when I happen to see them) from c.l.a to report@ than you are. So just in case I wasn't clear in my message above, here it is again: c.l.a and report@gnat are two separate media, and no bug reports are taken from c.l.a Of course Robert has made this pretty clear many times in the past, so this will be my first and last message clarifying this issue in this newsgroup. Arno