From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ac193220dd94f402
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-09 02:47:53 PST
Path: 
 supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!news.iac.net!news-out.cwix.com!newsfeed.cwix.com!feed2.news.rcn.net!rcn!netnews.com!oleane.net!oleane!jussieu.fr!enst!enst.fr!not-for-mail
From: Mario Amado Alves <maa@di.fct.unl.pt>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada and Database
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 10:47:16 +0000 (WET)
Organization: ENST, France
Sender: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10101091042100.27577-100000@lexis.di.fct.unl.pt>
Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 979037048 65098 137.194.161.2 (9 Jan 2001 10:44:08
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 10:44:08 +0000 (UTC)
To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
Return-Path: <maa@di.fct.unl.pt>
X-Authentication-Warning: lexis.di.fct.unl.pt: maa owned process doing -bs
In-Reply-To: <93e3oe$tt6$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org
X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail<->news gateway <comp.lang.ada.ada.eu.org>
Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org
X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:3801
Date: 2001-01-09T10:47:16+00:00

--...compatibility is defined as a license that does not "impose any
further restrictions". Yes the GPL is compatible with itself in this sense,
but it is also compatible with any less restrictive license. (Dewar)

--Hmmm... So a license slightly more restrictive than GPL may be
compatible with GPL.
=20
--No, that's false (perhaps there is a language problem, but the
sentence you quote from me is quite incompatible with your conclusion).
(Dewar)

--You are probably right. What I meant is an _open_source_ license (e.g.
Ad=AAlib's) slightly more restrictive than GPL may be compatible with GPL.=
=20
Thanks.

| |,| | | |RuaFranciscoTaborda24RcD 2815-249CharnecaCaparica 351+939354005
|M|A|R|I|O|
|A|M|A|D|O|DepartmentoDeInformaticaFCT/UNL 2825-114 Caparica 351+212958536
|A|L|V|E|S|                                                  fax 212948541
| | | | | |                 maa@di.fct.unl.pt                FCT 212948300