From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c30642befcd7bf85 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: John Howard Subject: Re: New GNAT ports Date: 1996/12/27 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 206230016 references: content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII organization: SkyNET Corporation mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-12-27T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: On 24 Dec 1996, Robert Dewar wrote: > Still the bottom line is certainly that GNAT technology can be ported > much more rapidly than other technologies which require a new code > generator to be written. I saw in a recent SEIC Reuse announcement that ACT has a new GNAT compiler designed for targeting real-time embedded systems. It had a version number around 2.01 or so. Please provide any information you can about it. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- John Howard -- Team Ada Team OS/2 --