From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,bdc41aa5ff8e1d93
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Richard Riehle <rriehle@nunic.nu.edu>
Subject: Re: Programmers -> Engineers; Engineers -> Programmers
Date: 1996/08/19
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.92.960819102006.27186B-100000@nunic.nu.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 175221079
references: <96081412132251@psavax.pwfl.com>
content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
organization: National University, San Diego
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-08-19T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>




 Jack W Scheible <jscheibl@MASON2.GMU.EDU> writes:
>In _my_ experience, people who major in Computer Science tend to be
>dullards; if they were not, they would have majored in EE.

 Mr. Scheible is probably a little embarrassed upon reading how this
 looks after being posted.

 If I understand his underlying point, the need for engineering education
 as part of the computer science curriculum, it is hard to support an
 argument against that position. The notion that Computer Science
 students should take a principles of engineering class is worthy of
 serious consideration.

 Richard Riehle