From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c56a86f3a4e16d06 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Brian Rogoff Subject: Re: Containers with Ada Date: 2000/11/20 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 695824243 References: <8v8pii$dvo$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8v8vbr$htl$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8vbia5$g7l$1@nnrp1.deja.com> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Complaints-To: abuse@verio.net X-Trace: sjc-read.news.verio.net 974740925 206.184.139.136 (Mon, 20 Nov 2000 17:22:05 GMT) Organization: Verio MIME-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 17:22:05 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-11-20T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Ted Dennison wrote: > In article , > Brian Rogoff wrote: > > > I guess for my tastes these restrictions one inherits from the use of > > controlled types with respect to nested subprograms makes their use > > for container libraries problematic. I use nested subprograms a lot, > > Its not just controlled types, but derived tagged types in general. Yes, I know that. However, one might want to use controlled types even while they don't want to use tagged types. Ada unifies (confuses :) the two notions so you don't have a choice. -- Brian