From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b2011d0de07e01d2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Brian Rogoff Subject: Re: wanted: Ada diff tool Date: 2000/05/03 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 618862165 References: <8eot2o$kbm$1@wanadoo.fr> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: nntp1.ba.best.com 957387991 199 bpr@206.184.139.136 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-05-03T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: On Wed, 3 May 2000, Jean-Pierre Rosen wrote: > On Adalog's component page (http://pro.wanadoo.fr/adalog/compo2.htm), you'll > find a small utility called Normalize that processes an Ada source and > removes comments, unnecessary spaces, and turns the whole text (except > strings) upper-case. This is precisely intended to make a diff on the > "semantic" part of the program. FWIW.... > > (I wrote this because of a lengthy discussion on this topic here some times > ago. It turned out that it was faster to write the utility than to discuss > about its desirability ;-) I think this also relates to why C has to date been more successful than Ada. Not enough Ada programmers have Jean-Pierre's excellent code-first-ask-questions-later attitude. Bravo J-P, we need to clone a bunch more of you! And yes, I'm entirely serious. "Hacking" seems to be a dirty word in the Ada community, even though Ada is an outstanding language for hacking, as well as for large scale disciplined software engineering. -- Brian