From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,4509214aa8b1885b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Brian Rogoff Subject: Re: GNAT Support Costs Date: 2000/02/10 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 584176504 References: <86ikmn$o9o$1@rk-comp.demon.co.uk> <86ssls$aim$1@rk-comp.demon.co.uk> <867lgtm6gz.fsf@ppp-162-235.villette.club-internet.fr> <8718j0$k6t$1@rk-comp.demon.co.uk> <86k8kqowac.fsf@ppp-108-200.villette.club-internet.fr> <87i3p2$ih4$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <38A2DE89.BB2A8C5D@gmx.de> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: nntp1.ba.best.com 950203320 219 bpr@206.184.139.136 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-02-10T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Andreas Winckler wrote: > Robert Dewar wrote: > > It is not at all ACT's intention to cover 100% of the > > needs of the Ada market. We specialize in a particular > > segment of the market, namely large scale users who want > > to use GNAT, and need high level support. > > Only innumerous small teams and projects create a mass market which is > what lacks Ada. Not concentrating on the market for small projects and > companies ist the right way to kill Ada. No language ever dies. There are even people today who use SNOBOL. GNAT provides a zero cost hobbyist solution. What is missing for small projects that you can't get from another company or the open source world? -- Brian