From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,4fe319e8a983326a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Brian Rogoff Subject: Re: Ada & C Date: 2000/01/09 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 570523709 References: <3878D189.80E1CCB4@gte.net> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: nntp1.ba.best.com 947459387 202 bpr@206.184.139.136 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-01-09T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: On Sun, 9 Jan 2000, Ehud Lamm wrote: > Finally, I guess it goes without saying that the place to get answers on > these topics is comp.lang.c/c++.* ;-) Perhaps, but I think that there is a lot to be said for adopting an Ada like style in C (and C++) and selecting books which demonstrate how this can be done is helpful for Ada programmers learning C. The comp.lang.c{++}.* newsgroups probably don't have the same ratio of people who know Ada and C/C++ as comp.lang.ada, since C and C++ are so much more popular. Anyone who knows Ada and not C is likely to have to learn it, and C++ too. It turns out that in the space of programming languages, Ada and C++ occupy a very similar position. -- Brian