From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,799e6e37c90ca633
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Brian Rogoff <bpr@shell5.ba.best.com>
Subject: Re: Future Ada language revisions?
Date: 1998/10/08
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9810081500220.3133-100000@shell5.ba.best.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 399145780
References: <6um7on$db5$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
 <6vj4sb$m3o$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: 907884278 4656 bpr 206.184.139.136
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-10-08T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Thu, 8 Oct 1998 dennison@telepath.com wrote:

> Ok, here's a couple of omissions I'm curious about. How come task and
> controlled types can't be tagged? It would sure be nice to be able to extend
> them.
> 
> --
> T.E.D.

Look up "inheritance anomaly" (on Alta Vista +"inheritance anomaly"
+"object oriented") for more info than you want. Synchronization is not so 
easily inherited.  

-- Brian