From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,799e6e37c90ca633 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Brian Rogoff Subject: Re: Future Ada language revisions? Date: 1998/10/04 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 397817809 References: <6um7on$db5$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <6v9es0$bnv$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: 907564785 26077 bpr 206.184.139.136 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-10-04T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: On Mon, 5 Oct 1998 dewarr@my-dejanews.com wrote: > In article , > Brian Rogoff wrote: > << text of message regarding out params for functions deleted>> > > I delete this text because it says nothing new (on either side). I strongly > suggest that everyone who wants to contribute to this thread first go to the > DN archives and look up the old threads on this subject, which has been argued > to death more than once. I see no reason to simply rerun old threads unless > there is something new to say! I'd be happy to oblige. If you remember the names and dates of the threads under which this topic has been argued (obviously *not* to death) I'll spend some time there looking. Since some of us don't have superfast connections, a suggestion to look on the Deja News archives without some more info is rather unhelpful. A naive search on obvious keywords turns up too much to scan. -- Brian