From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7fc767abbf17c947 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Brian Rogoff Subject: Re: Parsing a line into strings Date: 1998/07/08 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 369697771 References: <35A3A199.D55C3153@oit.edu> <35A3AB67.9039CBA9@oit.edu> <35A40A94.6DB73E65@chat.ru> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: 899940361 800 bpr 206.184.139.132 Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-07-08T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: On Thu, 9 Jul 1998, Dmitriy Anisimkov wrote: > C N wrote: > > > > Oh, sorry, I forgot to mention that I am using "ObjectAda - learning > > edition 7". I plan on getting gnat soon ( I heard it's much better ), > > but I have to make-do with this for now. > > > > Thanks for the info - I will keep that in mind when I swich > > It is posable to compile GNAT modules under the > Aonix "ObjectAda - learning edition 7". > I did it for generic sorting packages. It is not possible to easily port the GNAT Spitbol packages to any Ada 95 compiler which does not support the Unrestricted_Access attribute (amongst others) or some similar functionality. Of course, since downward closures are easily ;-) simulated by generics or objects, someone will of course rewrite this in portable Ada 95 to prove me wrong. This brings up the interesting question, related to the resuscitated downward funarg thread, of which Ada 95 compilers support Unrestricted_Access (under any name) or a similar feature. Any vendors care to comment? -- Brian