From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,37f42c4ebb5b5f04 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Brian Rogoff Subject: Re: Ada & Posix Date: 1998/02/23 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 328004206 References: <01bd3fe2$e3a76880$5d2c5c8b@aptiva> <34F16BAE.6005E4A8@cl.cam.ac.uk> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: 888279710 16781 bpr 206.184.139.132 Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-02-23T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: On 23 Feb 1998, Robert Dewar wrote: > Of course I understand the "if only Ada 95 provided XXX, then all the > world would flock from C/C++ to Ada 95." I look on all such claims > with what the US Secretary of Defence called an "Ohio attitude", namely > I won't be convinced till I see some evidence that such a claim is true :-) Totally off topic, but are you sure that shouldn't be a "Missouri attitude"? I must be culturally unsophisticated or something, but I thought that particular weltanschauung was a characteristic of the "show me" state. Which Ohio reference am I missing here? Also, if Ada 95 provided XXX, we'd be within our rights to spam the world with "ADULTS ONLY: Ada 95 does XXX!!!" :-) -- Brian