From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ca0b11ae1c9a00cb X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Brian Rogoff Subject: Re: Papers saying Ada as an overly complex language and hard to implement Date: 1998/02/17 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 325922162 References: <34E7B551.115C289F@cs.utexas.edu> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: 887736349 6130 bpr 206.184.139.132 Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-02-17T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: On 17 Feb 1998, Andi Kleen wrote: > Brian Rogoff writes: > > ... on the non-availability of free C++ (version>3.0) parsers ... > > Both the g++ 2.8.0 parser (which is bison based) and the parser used on the > TenDRA system (which is build around a home-grown parser generator) > parse reasonable recent C++ and are freely available. > > -Andi I sit corrected. Note that the g++ 2.8.0 parser is parsing "GNU C++", which means it *may* have problems working with the AT&T line, or some of the recent Draft ISO versions. As noted in another thread, it will be a while before C++ is really standardized. -- Brian